117th House — GGUM scores

data

GGUM ideal point estimates for the 117th House (members scored: 443 of 455; max PSRF: 1.032).

117th House — GGUM θ vs W-NOMINATE dim-1

Download

Download H117-ggum-scores.csv — 455 members, 25 columns (Voteview metadata + GGUM θ, θ SD, PSRF).

Off-diagonal members

The following 12 members fall more than 2.5σ off the OLS fit of GGUM θ on W-NOMINATE dim-1. We flag these as diagnostic cases where the two scalings most disagree.

MemberPartyStatenominateGGUM θresidual
BUSHDMO-0.25-2.64-1.75
TLAIBDMI-0.29-2.54-1.49
OMARDMN-0.30-2.47-1.40
OCASIO-CORTEZDNY-0.33-2.48-1.27
FLETCHERDTX-0.55-0.76+1.26
HERRELLRNM+0.94+2.39-1.20
BOWMANDNY-0.36-2.43-1.13
PRESSLEYDMA-0.38-2.38-1.01
UNDERWOODDIL-0.60-1.23+0.98
PORTERDCA-0.24-1.68-0.84
SLOTKINDMI-0.37-0.51+0.83
AUCHINCLOSSDMA-0.27-1.81-0.83

Placements worth a second look

GGUM’s placement of the following members differs from what their established political reputations might lead a reader to expect. We draw attention to these cases so that researchers can consider them before using the estimates for a particular analysis; we are not alleging error.

  • COOPER. Jim Cooper is commonly viewed as a longtime Blue Dog Democrat, frequently cited as among the most conservative House Democrats of his era. GGUM places him solidly within the progressive range of the chamber.

  • TORRES. Torres has publicly distinguished himself from the chamber’s Squad/AOC wing as a pragmatic, more centrist progressive. GGUM places him near the extreme-left end of the chamber.

← Back to the GGUM-for-Congress release


The prose on this page was drafted with Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.7, with plausibility audits by Claude Sonnet 4.5 subagents. The author edited and reviewed throughout.