106th House — GGUM scores
GGUM ideal point estimates for the 106th House (members scored: 437 of 440; max PSRF: 1.011).
Download
Download H106-ggum-scores.csv — 440 members, 25 columns (Voteview metadata + GGUM θ, θ SD, PSRF).
Off-diagonal members
The following 7 members fall more than 2.5σ off the OLS fit of GGUM θ on W-NOMINATE dim-1. We flag these as diagnostic cases where the two scalings most disagree.
| Member | Party | State | nominate | GGUM θ | residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JONES | R | NC | +0.24 | +1.61 | +1.06 |
| BILBRAY | R | CA | +0.39 | +0.22 | -0.75 |
| MARTÍNEZ | D | CA | -0.34 | -0.39 | +0.69 |
| SCARBOROUGH | R | FL | +0.67 | +1.10 | -0.65 |
| SANFORD | R | SC | +0.69 | +2.39 | +0.60 |
| DeFAZIO | D | OR | -0.43 | -1.85 | -0.53 |
| POMBO | R | CA | +0.46 | +1.68 | +0.52 |
← Back to the GGUM-for-Congress release
The prose on this page was drafted with Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.7, with plausibility audits by Claude Sonnet 4.5 subagents. The author edited and reviewed throughout.